

Fixed rate electricity plans in Texas have to charge the same price in every billing period of the term, with exactly three exceptions written into the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) rule that defines them, 16 TAC 25.475(b)(5): actual changes in TDU delivery charges, changes to ERCOT or Texas Regional Entity administrative fees, and new costs imposed by law. A possible fourth, grid reserve costs, is now under review in PUCT Project 59997.
That fourth path isn't new, and it has never been used. The same rule already lets the PUCT designate a specific ancillary service as a cost beyond a provider's control for existing contracts. The one petition the commission has decided under that sentence, for a reserve product called ECRS, was denied in December 2024. On November 5, 2026, PUCT Staff asked whether the path should be repealed, rebuilt with clear rules, or used for ERCOT's newest reserve product, DRRS. Comments are due December 4, 2026. Nothing has been decided.
A fixed rate locks in the total price for each billing period of the contract term, not just the energy charge. The PUCT's definition of a fixed rate product in 16 TAC 25.475(b)(5) covers "all recurring charges and ancillary service charges," and the term must be at least three months.
Two other parts of the same rule shape what "fixed" means on a Texas electricity bill:
A fixed rate is not a fixed bill. The price holds, but the bill still rises and falls with the kilowatt-hours you use. If you're still choosing between plan types, Fixed-Rate vs Variable-Rate Electricity in Texas covers that decision. This article is about what can still move after you sign.
The rule lets a fixed price vary from the disclosed amount for three reasons only, and anything outside them stays locked for the term. In the words of 25.475(b)(5), the price may vary "solely to reflect actual changes in TDU charges, changes to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) or Texas Regional Entity, Inc. administrative fees charged to loads or changes resulting from federal, state or local laws that impose new or modified fees or costs on a REP that are beyond the REP's control."

TDU delivery charges are the fees your local wires utility, such as Oncor, CenterPoint, AEP Texas or TNMP, bills through your provider to move power to your meter. They are the exception most Texans actually see, because every provider in a territory bills the same delivery charges and a fixed plan can pass a change straight through.
The most recent large example is Oncor. Its residential delivery charge rose from 6.0295 to 6.8673 cents per kWh on October 4, 2026, about $8.38 more at 1,000 kWh a month (as of October 4, 2026), under PUCT Docket 59249. Oncor's fixed monthly charges stayed at $4.06. Those rates are temporary until the PUCT issues a final order, as the Oncor delivery charge breakdown explains. For every territory's line items, see TDU Delivery Charges Explained, and for TNMP's September steps and December surcharge, see the TNMP rate guide.
ERCOT, the grid operator for most of Texas, funds itself through a system administration fee charged per megawatt-hour of load, and a change in that fee is the second allowed reason. Texas Regional Entity, which monitors reliability standards in the ERCOT region, is named in the same clause.
This exception is usually tiny. The PUCT approved changing ERCOT's System Administration Fee from $0.63 to $0.61 per MWh, effective January 1, 2026, according to ERCOT's 45-day market notice. One MWh is 1,000 kWh, so on a 1,000 kWh month that change is $0.02.
The third reason covers changes from federal, state or local laws that impose new or modified fees or costs on a REP that are beyond the REP's control. It needs a law, not a market move, which makes it the narrowest of the three in day-to-day practice.
One word-level detail is worth knowing. The indexed product definition right below it, 25.475(b)(6), adds "or regulatory actions" to the same exception. The fixed rate definition leaves those words out and handles grid reserve costs in a separate sentence of its own, which is where Project 59997 comes in.
This table puts every possible cause side by side, with the latest real case for each and its size on a 1,000 kWh month.
| Possible cause of a change | Allowed under 25.475(b)(5) today? | Latest real case | Size at 1,000 kWh a month |
|---|---|---|---|
| TDU delivery charges | Yes, actual changes only | Oncor, October 4, 2026 (Docket 59249) | About $8.38 more |
| ERCOT administrative fee | Yes | $0.63 to $0.61 per MWh, January 1, 2026 | $0.02 less |
| New fees or costs imposed by law | Yes, if beyond the provider's control | Needs a new or modified law | Set by the law |
| Ancillary service (grid reserve) costs | No, unless the PUCT expressly designates a specific product | ECRS petition denied December 19, 2024. DRRS under review in Project 59997 | $0 today. No DRRS cost per kWh has been published |
| Wholesale price swings, heat waves, scarcity pricing | No | Not listed in the rule | $0 |
No. Ancillary service costs are already part of a Texas fixed price, and the rule says the price "may not vary from the disclosed amount to reflect changes in ancillary service charges unless the commission expressly designates a specific type of ancillary service product as incurring charges beyond the REP's control for a customer's existing contract." No ancillary service product has ever received that designation.
Ancillary services are the reserves ERCOT buys so the grid can cover a sudden loss of a power plant or a fast swing in demand. Retail providers pay their share of those costs. Because a fixed price includes ancillary service charges by definition, the cost risk of reserves sits with the provider for the length of a fixed term.
The designation sentence is the one opening the rule leaves. It is written narrowly: a specific type of ancillary service product, an express commission designation, and existing contracts only.
No. The only petition the PUCT has decided under the designation sentence was denied. In Docket 55959, the Texas Energy Association for Marketers and the Alliance for Retail Markets filed a joint petition on December 8, 2023, asking the commission to designate ERCOT Contingency Reserve Service (ECRS) so providers could make a one-time adjustment to certain existing fixed-rate contracts. The PUCT issued its declaratory order on December 19, 2024, and the answer was no.
The request covered fixed-rate contracts signed on or before June 9, 2023. According to EnergyChoiceMatters' report of the decision, the PUCT found providers had adequate notice that ECRS was coming. The final order said ERCOT's ECRS procurement in 2023 totaled 2,531 MW, "which was within the estimated range of 1,093 MW and 3,039 MW that ERCOT provided to the Wholesale Market Working Group in 2022."
Commissioners Lori Cobos and Kathleen Jackson voted to deny the petition. Chairman Thomas Gleeson and Commissioner Courtney Hjaltman were recused. The final order did not adopt an administrative law judge's broader proposed conclusion that "there is no question that REPs have a significantly greater ability to [accurately predict A/S costs] than their residential and small commercial customers," so the larger question of who should carry new reserve costs was left open.
The Retail Electric Provider Coalition filed a motion for rehearing on January 13, 2025. On January 22, 2025, the commission voted not to add it to an open meeting agenda.

DRRS, short for Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service, is a new ancillary service ERCOT is building under Nodal Protocol Revision Request 1309. ERCOT's NPRR1309 page says the change "develops Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service (DRRS) as a new Ancillary Service," and records PUCT approval on July 9, 2026, "as presented in Project No. 54445."
Before that vote, the Retail Electric Provider Coalition asked for order language designating DRRS as a service "that will incur costs beyond the REPs' control at the time that service is incorporated into the ERCOT Ancillary Services plan," EnergyChoiceMatters reported. The July order left that language out, and the PUCT said it would open a project instead.
At the July open meeting, PUCT Chair Thomas Gleeson said he didn't know when the commission would move forward, adding, "I don't think there are lot of details around how that would be done, safeguards for customers, and the like," according to the same EnergyChoiceMatters report. He recommended a project "to see what changes need to be made, what details or guardrails need to be put around this," and tied the issue to the commission's concern with "affordability."
That project is Project 59997. Staff filed the control request on July 15, 2026, and on October 28, 2026 the project was restyled "Treatment of DRRS and Other Future Ancillary Services Costs in Existing Fixed-Rate Retail Contracts."
DRRS isn't running yet. ERCOT estimates DRRS will be fully implemented in mid-2028, according to an October 29, 2026 PUCT staff memo, which says ERCOT's project management office gave that estimate at an October 2026 Protocol Revision Subcommittee meeting. The same memo says DRRS "must also be considered in ERCOT's 2028 AS Methodology development so that quantities may be determined." ERCOT's own comments for its June 2026 board vote also said "Implementation in 2028." No DRRS cost per kWh has been published.
On November 5, 2026, PUCT Rules & Projects Staff filed questions for comment in Project 59997, and one option on the table is removing the ancillary-service path from the fixed rate rule altogether. Comments are due December 4, 2026, and reply comments are due December 18, 2026. Staff hasn't proposed a rule change, and nothing has been decided.
The Staff memo, from Luisa Venegoni of Rules & Projects, asks stakeholders to address these open questions, as summarized in the memo and in EnergyChoiceMatters' November 5 report:
Staff's questions run in both directions. Some would close the path for good. Others would write the rules for using it.
The Office of Public Utility Counsel (OPUC), the state agency that represents residential and small commercial consumers, filed a notice of participation on November 9, 2026. As of November 13, 2026, the project lists four filings, and OPUC's notice is the most recent.
Only the longer terms do, based on ERCOT's current estimate. A 12-month fixed plan signed in November 2026 ends in November 2027, before mid-2028. A 24-month plan ends in November 2028 and a 36-month plan in November 2029, so both run past the estimated DRRS start.
| Fixed term signed in November 2026 | Contract ends | Overlaps ERCOT's mid-2028 DRRS estimate? |
|---|---|---|
| 12 months | November 2027 | No |
| 24 months | November 2028 | Yes |
| 36 months | November 2029 | Yes |
Overlap by itself changes nothing on your bill. A DRRS cost could reach an existing fixed price only if the PUCT designated DRRS under 25.475(b)(5) or changed the rule, and then allowed a variation for existing contracts. One of the options Staff put on the table would remove that path entirely. The mid-2028 date is also an estimate, and it can move.
The protection on the other three causes is the same for every term length. For when to lock in, the forward price curve guide covers timing, and the renewal guide covers the notice and switching windows at the end of a term.
Your Electricity Facts Label (EFL) and Terms of Service spell out exactly when your price can move. Start with the EFL Disclosure Chart's answer to "Can my price change during the contract period?" and the row beneath it, then find the fixed rate section of the Terms of Service.
Ambit Energy's own documents use the rule's three causes. The Ambit Texas Residential Terms of Service (version v. TOU103123, dated October 31, 2023) says: "The price of a fixed rate product may change during a contract term only to reflect changes in TDU charges, changes to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) or Texas Regional Entity administrative fees charged to loads or changes resulting from federal, state or local laws that impose new or modified fees or costs on REPs, including Ambit Energy, that are beyond our control." To see how Ambit's plans and terms compare, see Every Ambit Energy Plan Compared.
Not on an existing fixed-rate contract under today's rule. A DRRS cost could reach a fixed price only if the PUCT expressly designated DRRS or changed the rule, and neither has happened. ERCOT estimates DRRS will be fully implemented in mid-2028, and no DRRS cost per kWh has been published.
No. Wholesale price swings are not one of the three causes in 25.475(b)(5). A heat wave or a winter storm can raise your bill through higher usage, but not your fixed price. What a Texas winter storm can and can't do to your electric bill covers the winter side.
No. A fixed rate holds your price, while your bill still moves with the kilowatt-hours you use. Budget billing smooths the bill amount instead, without changing what you pay over the year, as the Average Monthly Billing guide explains.
It depends on your Terms of Service. Ambit Energy's Texas Residential Terms of Service says: "Price changes resulting from these scenarios do not require us to provide you with advance notice."
Comments go to Project No. 59997 by December 4, 2026, with reply comments by December 18, 2026, according to the Staff memo. Every filing is posted on the PUCT Interchange listing for Project 59997.
Plan details and rates subject to change. TDU charges and ERCOT fees in this article are as of the dates shown.
Copyright © 2026 VIPEnergyService.com. All rights reserved | PUCT# 10117
Important message regarding earnings: Ambit Energy makes no guarantee or promise of income or business. Anyone considering building a full-time or part-time Ambit business should have realistic expectations of their potential income. Learn more at goambit.com/disclaimer.